Aviation English Language Training – A Perspective
All international aircraft operators, whether) the pilot or air traffic control officers (air traffic controllers, at least English language proficiency requirements of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), which entered into force on 5 March 2008 established criteria. The objective of the ICAO standards is to “to raise the Aviation English” communications worldwide as a means of improving safety both in the air and on the ground.
Aviation communications in any language are highly specialized. The term ‘Aviation English’ covers a much wider field of language skills and expertise than most native speakers of English to use in their daily lives. In addition, another important consideration that the aviation environment, and 2 critical factors of daily life in this community: that of the urgency of the situation and non-routine situation. Aircraft operators learn very precise procedures, definitions and rules and regulations, and all are presented in a very formal, precise and unambiguous language. Run the unknown, the frequent cases where something is not as it should, or in the way that the parties expect to happen and we can easily determine where many of the most important are communication problems.
Pilots and air traffic controllers are well trained to deal with the unexpected, yet no organization or person for all cases in such precarious conditions, may be just. In such situations, therefore, yet another factor comes into play: the deterioration of the services of a person under stress and under duress. In a very difficult and constantly changing and always challenging working environment, with the danger and the unexpected circumstances can change within seconds, is associated to move both crises and panic among those directly affected. This takes time, individual performance levels Lot and instinct. Effective communication is great and needs instinctively. If one then the additional complication of a particular person, that, if not 2, one more in the air and on the floor, operate in a second language can affect performance. Hence the importance and necessity of a high level of English language skills in all concerned.
English language trainers are therefore faced with a daunting task in facilitating the service is needed to satisfy worldwide requirements for effective training in Aviation English. The ICAO pulses, quite rightly, on the general English-language comprehension, which is the basis for an education. However, at a minimum communication standards for the safe operation of aircraft internationally, the trainers with the contextual issues. It is the enormous scope of English in the context of aviation, that language is to coach a major challenge.
Aircraft operators require an enormous range of knowledge, terminology and phraseology to function effectively in their daily tasks. In a short English language course for aircraft operators must therefore examine the trainers, where they place the emphasis. Many trainers focus on R / T phraseology, but, while standard terms of air transport is an important aspect of communication, it is only one of many. Most pilots are familiar with the usual R / T phraseology, they use it every day. Language instructors must therefore focus on the many aspects of non-standard and non-routine phraseology that used in an emergency and could potentially create difficulties for non-native speakers, ie those aspects of the English language, not necessarily in the air Manuals covered space.
Often the language is a prerequisite training is more often than not with budget constraints, operational and logistical constraints, considerations, driven on the role of a client to whom it is always recognized the need to air English-training time. Trainers are often required to sponsor groups of trainees, a scenario that the train works well only if the specialization of individual trainees, their training needs and also the English language of the different levels are similar. It must be stressed that the needs of pilots and air traffic controllers are very different: While the group sponsored scenario generally works well with the pilots of similar rating to take into account the air traffic controller training, 3 very different professional specializations, each of which its special requirements: Aerodrome Control, Approach Control and Area Radar Control.
Problems arise on those occasions when either chooses a specific sponsor or training provider seeks the “one-size-fits-all” scenario, an option that all too often be the most practical part of the sponsor, for operational or economic reasons on the part of the training providers in terms of relief. The result is too often unsatisfactory, with individual students, or made a small group of trainees, since they agree completely on courses where the group as a whole – by far the least efficient way of achieving a satisfactory result from any perspective.
Provided there is adequate compromise, understanding and agreement between the customer and the training provider, but the sponsored-group scenario can work well, as long as all parties to ensure that each group selected for the training consists of trainees of the same air-specialization, persons of similar experience and personnel exchanges with similar English-language skills. The real key to success is, however, that are before the course starts on the training objectives and learning outcomes clearly defined and that above all they will have agreed in advance between the client and the training. Within such a package of training rate can then negotiate to achieve their own learning program and to adopt precise and specific learning outcomes both efficiently and effectively.
